Confessions of a Young Novelist
By Michelle Miles
On the night of October 7, Barack Obama and John McCain shared
a stage in Nashville, Tennessee for the second of three scheduled
presidential debates. That same evening, Umberto Eco concluded
his three-part Richard Ellmann Lecture series at Emory University
with a bilingual reading from Foucault’s Pendulum. Despite
the unavoidable scheduling conflict between Eco’s reading
and the presidential debate, the Italian novelist, semiotician,
and professor drew a considerable and attentive crowd.
The atmosphere in the Schwartz Center was lively and expectant;
after three days and an equal number of compelling lectures, Eco’s
audience had gathered for the finale, and as the rich sibilants
of his speech rose to fill the generous acoustic space of the
performing arts center, first in English, then in rolling Italian,
there was an unmistakable spell cast in the theater. Having been
captivated by the man himself for the past three days, it was
as if the audience was freed in this closing ceremony to wander
the labyrinth of narrative, to lose oneself, as it were, in a
wondrous story.
For three days, we had absorbed the flawlessly woven discourse
of scholarly expertise and human curiosity, followed erudite discussions
of textual creation, interpretation, and personal and historical
influence. Now, in the final hour of his visit and as much of
our nation tuned in to a discussion between two individuals poised
to influence the next political phase of our world, those of us
seated at Eco’s feet were invited to enter a high-stakes
game of our own: we were called to dive into another world, one
very much like the one in which we live, but imagined, created,
even uncannily remembered by one creative, creating mind addressing
our own.
In the second of his three Richard Ellmann lectures, entitled
“Author, Text, and Interpreters,” Umberto Eco expounded
upon the relationship of memory to imagination. Recounting his
last twenty-five years as a “serious” book collector,
Eco told of his discovery of a text by Aristotle that he had long
forgotten was part of his library. Flipping through the pages,
he came upon a sticky substance, which had glued the corner of
several sheets together. Only at that moment did Eco realize with
delighted astonishment that his discovery of such a text –
synchronous with his protagonist Adso’s own – was
not the stuff of purely invented authorial whim, but rather stemmed
from this rediscovered truth, from a very real book housed and
forgotten in his own very real library, a casualty of memory but
not of fact. Thus, as Eco confessed to his audience, The Name
of the Rose was a novel not entirely conjured, but was rather
in part lived, in part forgotten, re-created unknowingly, and
finally, re-encountered and remembered. Listening to the author
read from his own text on the final evening of his visit, I could
not help but observe that he, too, seemed to delight in the magic
world it conjured, as if the source of the tale and the words
that gave it form were as mysterious to the mind that penned them
as they were to our own. As mysterious and as magical.
Inaugurated in 1988 by Nobel Prize winning poet, Seamus Heaney,
the Richard Ellmann Lectures in Modern Literature were established
in the name of a literary scholar known not only for the brilliance
of his work but for the extraordinary generosity of his character.
Internationally reputed for his award winning and best-selling
biographies of James Joyce, Oscar Wilde, and W.B. Yeats, as well
as an esteemed professor at Harvard, Yale, the University of Chicago,
and Oxford (where he was Goldsmiths’ Professor of English
Literature from 1970-1984), Richard Ellmann was a dedicated teacher
and lifelong learner whose legacy as a literary giant was matched
only by his reputation as a truly human scholar. Professor Ron
Schuchard explains: “A soft-spoken teacher who was a taskmaster
of substance and style, [Richard Ellmann] inspired excellence
in scores of students who are now leading scholars and critics
in universities throughout the world.”
Emory was privileged to welcome Ellmann to its faculty in 1976,
and for the following ten years, to benefit from his presence
on campus each spring. His legacy lives on at Emory University
through the Ellmann Lectures and the personable, gifted, and creative
intellects who gather, in his honor, to keep alive the spirit
of inquiry and excellence Ellmann so aspired to and embodied throughout
his lifetime.
Over the years, a winsome cast of poets, novelists, and literary
critics have come to Emory as Ellmann lecturers. Naturally, each
guest has been unique in style, in approach, and in creative temperament.
But what all have shared is the unmistakable touch of imaginative
and humbly human eloquence; to listen to an Ellmann lecturer is
to be invited to believe once more in the capacity of literature,
in all of its many guises, to provoke, to educate, to interrogate,
and perhaps most importantly, to delight the mind’s eye
with wonder, to build castles in alternate worlds, to facilitate
our dreams, and, for the academic among us, to dismantle the acquired
armor of jargon-laden discourse in favor of clear diction and
honest approach.
Umberto Eco’s visit marked the twentieth anniversary of
the Ellmann Lectures. As I sat in the auditorium that final evening,
I recalled why I came to graduate school in the first place: for
the love of a clever tale and a crafted line; in pursuit of creative
joy. As I glanced around the theater, I saw faces both part of
the university community and outside of it, young and old, infinitely
varied, and I was reminded of the pull of a good storyteller on
all of us. The comprehensive title of Eco’s lecture series,
Confessions of a Young Novelist, made a great deal of sense by
the end of his visit; the presence of play in both title and in
speaker were palpable and contagious. I left each lecture with
a buoyed spirit, rushing home to read.
In his seventies, Umberto Eco is a disarming combination of wise
man and novice. There is a freshness to his work and a youthfulness
in his step. His lectures were a tribute to the lifelong pilgrimage
that is every writer’s path, as well as to the hardy-but-generous
character required to connect with an audience both on and off
the page. And in the words of Seamus Heaney, “[Richard Ellmann]
would have loved every minute of them.”
Michelle Miles is a fifth year PhD candidate working towards a dissertation
on Northern Irish poetry, the Classics, and translation.